As we all know, crafting and upholding a competitive compensation strategy is not merely a tactical necessity but a strategic differentiator in today’s volatile labour market.
With companies often sourcing talent in a limited talent pool, the practice of salary and benefits benchmarking emerges as an indispensable tool to maintain equilibrium between organisational objectives and workforce expectations.
Research by Reed, of 5,000 employed adults in the UK, at the end of 2024, to help inform their suite of salary guides, highlighted 45% of those surveyed were not happy with their current salary levels. Sixty per cent said their salary had not risen with the cost of living, and 59% of people said a salary increase would make them feel more valued. These are large numbers considering the need for companies to actively retain talent, in a labour market rife with skills gaps.
The following five indicators represent critical moments when benchmarking compensation structures transcends routine practice, becoming a strategic imperative for sustained talent acquisition and retention efficacy.
1. Escalation in offer rejections and counteroffers
A rising trend in offer rejections or aggressive counteroffers is one of the earliest indicators of misalignment between your pay and benefits structure and market dynamics. Candidates are often equipped with access to advanced salary transparency tools and are no longer passive participants in salary negotiations, but on the ball with data-driven expectations.
From an academic perspective, this phenomenon aligns with equity theory, where individuals assess the fairness of their inputs (skills, experience) relative to outputs (compensation). An outdated compensation model may fail to meet these expectations, resulting in disengagement during the hiring process.
2. Prolonged vacancies in critical roles
Extended vacancy periods for key positions signal a potential disconnect between the value candidates assign to their skills and what your company offers. This issue is particularly pronounced in industries, such as financial services, finance or technology, where specialised skills command a premium. The economic cost of such delays is substantial, with ripple effects across productivity, innovation, and team morale.
3. Elevated voluntary turnover rates
High turnover rates, particularly among high-performing employees, often point to compensation dissatisfaction as a root cause. While exit interviews are a common diagnostic tool, advanced sentiment analysis of internal employee feedback systems can provide deeper insights into whether pay and benefits are contributing factors.
Studies in behavioural economics reveal that perceived pay inequity triggers dissatisfaction, reducing engagement and increasing turnover propensity. Moreover, organisations that fail to benchmark salaries frequently risk inadvertently creating internal inequities, which can exacerbate turnover trends.
4. Industry disruption or labour market volatility
As you know, the UK labour market is far from static, and periods of industry disruption - whether due to technological advancements, economic shifts, or sociocultural trends - demand immediate recalibration of compensation strategies. For instance, the rise of remote work has dismantled geographic pay norms, introducing complexity into traditional benchmarking models. Agility in responding to external shocks is a hallmark of resilient business. Compensation benchmarking during such periods ensures that your organisation remains competitive, even as market dynamics shift.
5. Divergence in employee benefit expectations
Compensation benchmarking must extend beyond base salaries to include total rewards. Shifts in societal priorities - such as the emphasis on mental health, flexibility, and sustainability - have redefined what employees value. Traditional benefits packages, while still essential, are no longer sufficient to differentiate an employer in a competitive market.
Emerging research highlights the importance of psychological contracts in the employer-employee relationship. When benefits do not align with evolving expectations, employees may perceive a breach of this contract, leading to disengagement.
The strategic and economic implications of neglecting benchmarking
Neglecting regular benchmarking of salaries and benefits can lead to compounded challenges, including reduced talent acquisition efficiency, increased turnover costs, and diminished employer brand equity. From a systems theory perspective, these outcomes are interdependent, with deficiencies in one area amplifying vulnerabilities in others.
Moreover, the opportunity cost of not attracting top-tier talent in a hyper-competitive market is significant, particularly in knowledge-driven industries where human capital is the primary source of value creation.
Redefining benchmarking for strategic impact
Compensation benchmarking is no longer a static exercise confined to annual salary reviews; it is a dynamic, strategic process that underpins successful talent acquisition and retention. By proactively addressing the five indicators outlined above, your organisation can maintain alignment with market expectations, mitigate talent risks, and position themselves as employers of choice.
The future of benchmarking lies in leveraging technology, predictive analytics, and employee-centric methodologies to build compensation frameworks that are not only competitive but also forward-looking. For talent acquisition professionals, the challenge is clear: embrace innovation in benchmarking practices or risk obsolescence in a rapidly evolving talent landscape.
Need help with salary and reward benchmarking? Get in touch with one of our salary and reward benchmarking specialists now, or find out more about our service here.
